Section 232 Tariffs: In-Depth Analysis of US Steel and Aluminum Import Restrictions
The 25% tariff on steel and 10% tariff on aluminum imposed under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act have been forcing structural changes in Korean steel and aluminum exports since first taking effect in March 2018. Korea negotiated a separate arrangement with the United States, opting for a quota system (2.63 million tons per year) instead of the 25% tariff — but the risk of the full 25% rate applying immediately upon quota exhaustion remains. As of the first half of 2025, Korean steel exports to the United States stand at approximately USD 3 billion per year. Tariff Response 119 FAQ Part 4-1 compiles answers from customs brokers and trade law specialists to the 20 most frequently asked practical questions from corporate practitioners.
FAQ Part 1: Section 232 Tariff Fundamentals (Q1–Q8)
This section covers fundamental questions on the legal basis and structure of Section 232 tariffs, the scope of application to Korean-origin goods, and how the quota system operates. Practitioners who are new to this issue are recommended to start with this section.
| Question | Key Answer | Practical Note |
|---|---|---|
| Q1. What is the legal basis for Section 232? | Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 — grants authority to restrict imports that threaten national security | Enacted and amended by presidential executive order |
| Q2. What products are covered? | Steel: all of HS Chapters 72–73 / Aluminum: all of HS Chapter 76 | Must verify specific HTS codes |
| Q3. Is Korea subject to a quota or a tariff? | 2018 Korea-US consultation: Korea chose a quota (2.63M tons/year) instead of the 25% tariff | Shipments exceeding quota are immediately subject to 25% |
| Q4. How is the quota allocated by quarter? | Annual quota divided equally across 4 quarters (657,500 tons per quarter) | No carryover between quarters; timing adjustment is essential |
| Q5. Is there a quota for aluminum from Korea? | No quota for aluminum — the 10% tariff applies directly (Korea was not included in aluminum consultations) | The 10% rate applies in full |
| Q6. Are derivative steel products included? | Some derivative products such as bolts and nuts are partially subject to expanded Section 232 (since 2020) | Re-verify your own HTS codes |
| Q7. Can Section 232 coexist with FTA benefits? | Section 232 tariffs are imposed separately, displacing the zero-tariff benefits under KORUS FTA | FTA zero-tariff treatment does not apply |
| Q8. Are refunds available? | A portion of import duties may be refunded via the drawback program; export documentation is required | Application deadline: 5 years from import date |
FAQ Part 2: Corporate Impact and Quota Management (Q9–Q14)
Practice-focused Q&A on quota exhaustion risk and monitoring methods, exclusion request procedures, and the legal risks of origin circumvention. This is the area most frequently asked about by Korean companies exporting steel to the United States.
Corporate Response Strategies — Tailored by Size and Sector
The corporate response to Section 232 tariffs should be approached in three phases: short-term, medium-term, and long-term. Leveraging Asian production bases including Bangladesh is emerging as a core element of medium-term strategy.
| Product | HS Code | Annual Export Value | Section 232 Rate | Quota Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot-rolled coil | 7208 | $800M | 0% within quota | Included in 2.63M tons/yr |
| Cold-rolled coil | 7209 | $500M | 0% within quota | Included in 2.63M tons/yr |
| Steel pipe & tube | 7306 | $400M | 0% or 25% | Some overlap with ADD |
| Stainless steel | 7219 | $300M | Many exclusions filed | High exclusion approval rate |
| Aluminum rolled products | 7606 | $200M | 10% fixed | No quota — taxed in full |
FAQ Part 3: Advanced Practical Topics (Q15–Q20)
Q&A on advanced issues that arise frequently in practice — including FTZ utilization, customs valuation, and importer recordkeeping. Especially useful for legal and customs compliance teams.