Resources

Trade Regulation Trends Report v3 Final: Analysis of the Global Trade Environment

Overview of Global Trade Regulation Trends

The final v3 trade regulation trends report provides a consolidated review of the most important shifts in the global trade environment during the first half of 2025. It assesses how tighter U.S. tariff policy, the operational rollout of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and China's retaliatory tariff measures are influencing Korean exporters and the broader trade environment surrounding Bangladesh. As protectionism has intensified in 2025, non-tariff barriers have become materially more significant in practical business strategy.

1,200+
Additional U.S. tariff items
6
EU CBAM sectors
340
Global trade disputes
$18B
Estimated impact on Korean exports

Changes in U.S. Tariff Policy and Their Effects

In 2025, the United States significantly expanded additional tariffs on Chinese-origin products and also began re-examining steel and aluminum tariffs applied to allied economies. The policy direction is notable for its combined use of multiple trade defense instruments, including Section 301, Section 232, anti-dumping measures, and countervailing duties. Korean exporters face both direct and indirect exposure, particularly in steel, semiconductors, and automotive supply chains.

Major U.S. Trade Restrictions in 2025
Measure TypeTarget Country/ProductTariff Rate or ActionImpact on Korea
Section 301Chinese electronics and batteries25 to 100%Indirect impact via supply chains
Section 232Steel and aluminum25%Direct impact through weaker exports
Anti-dumping dutiesSelected Korean steel products5.7 to 12.3%Direct impact
IRA subsidy rulesEVs and batteriesConditional tax creditsMixed: opportunity and risk
Export controlsAdvanced semiconductors and equipmentRestrictions on exports to ChinaIndirect impact through technology dependence

EU CBAM and the Expansion of Non-Tariff Barriers

The European Union began implementing CBAM in earnest from 2025, imposing carbon-related costs on imports across six sectors: steel, cement, fertilizer, aluminum, electricity, and hydrogen. In practice, this functions as a non-tariff barrier that can weigh heavily on exporters from developing economies with higher embedded emissions. For Bangladesh, there is a credible possibility that the apparel sector could eventually fall within an expanded CBAM scope, making early adaptation essential.

Tariff Barriers
ScopeDirect import taxes
ExamplesAnti-dumping, CVD, safeguards
Business effectImmediate erosion of price competitiveness
Non-Tariff Barriers
ScopeRegulatory and procedural barriers
ExamplesCBAM, standards, certification, SPS
Business effectHigher compliance and administrative costs
Emerging Regulatory Themes
FocusNew forms of trade regulation
ExamplesESG disclosure, due diligence, digital trade rules
Business effectBroader compliance obligations across markets

Bangladesh's Trade Environment and Implications for Korean Firms

Bangladesh is preparing for graduation from Least Developed Country status in 2026, after which it may lose access to preferential tariff treatment under GSP schemes. That shift could weaken export competitiveness in several sectors. Korean companies therefore need to reassess investment and export strategies with closer attention to Bangladesh's evolving trade conditions.

01
Preparing for LDC Graduation
With graduation expected in 2026, policy attention should focus on offsetting the loss of GSP preferences, including faster review of a Korea-Bangladesh FTA or EPA framework.
02
Export Diversification
Businesses should reduce overconcentration on the U.S. and EU by expanding toward emerging markets in the Middle East and Africa.
03
Preemptive CBAM Response
Maintaining access to the EU market will require carbon-reduction investment and stronger environmental certification capabilities.
04
Supply Chain Reconfiguration Opportunity
As supply chains adjust to prolonged U.S.-China trade tensions, Bangladesh can strengthen its role as an alternative production base.
05
Adapting to Digital Trade Rules
E-commerce governance, cross-border data rules, and wider digital trade disciplines may open new export opportunities if addressed early.

Response Strategy and Outlook

The current trend toward stronger trade restrictions is likely to persist in the near term. Korean firms should reinforce regulatory monitoring, conduct regular product- and market-level risk reviews, and update response plans accordingly. In particular, proactive preparation for supply-chain due diligence and ESG-related regulation will be critical to preserving market access.

Regulation Monitoring
Track real-time changes in U.S., EU, and Chinese trade measures
Risk Assessment
Evaluate product- and market-specific exposure, then rank priorities
Response Planning
Develop tariff optimization, origin diversification, and certification strategies
Execution and Review
Implement the strategy, measure outcomes, and refresh the framework regularly
Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariff FAQFrequently asked questions and practical guidance on responding to U.S. Section 232 tariffs
Corporate Survey on a Korea-Bangladesh EPAAnalysis of business views and expected benefits related to Korea-Bangladesh EPA and FTA discussions
trade regulationtrade environmenttariffsnon-tariff barrierstrend report
Trade Regulation Trends Report v3 Final: Analysis of the Global Trade Environment | Dhaka Trade Portal